There is a longstanding debate over whether or not children should be tried as adults in the criminal justice system. On one hand, some argue that children who commit serious crimes should be held accountable for their actions and that trying them as adults is the only way to ensure justice is served. On the other hand, others argue that children are not fully developed cognitively and emotionally and therefore should not be held to the same standards as adults.
One reason some people argue that children should be tried as adults is that it sends a strong message to other young people that criminal behavior will not be tolerated. This may serve as a deterrent to other children who may be considering committing a crime. Additionally, trying children as adults may also serve as a way to protect society from dangerous individuals. If a child has committed a serious crime, such as murder or rape, there is a concern that they may continue to pose a risk to society if they are not held accountable for their actions.
However, there are also strong arguments against trying children as adults. One of the main arguments is that children are not fully developed cognitively and emotionally and therefore may not fully understand the consequences of their actions. Children also may not have the same level of impulse control as adults, and may be more susceptible to peer pressure or outside influences. This means that they may not be fully responsible for their actions in the same way that an adult would be.
Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that children who are tried as adults are more likely to reoffend once they are released from prison. This may be due to the fact that they are not given the same opportunities for rehabilitation and education as adults, and may not have the same support systems in place. This means that trying children as adults may not be the most effective way to prevent future criminal behavior.
In conclusion, the decision to try children as adults is a complex and controversial one. While there are valid arguments on both sides, it is important to consider the long-term implications and the potential impact on the child's development and future behavior. Ultimately, the best approach may be to find a middle ground, where children who commit serious crimes are held accountable for their actions, but also given the opportunity for rehabilitation and education.
Should Juveniles Be Charged as Adults in the Criminal Justice System?
A juvenile who is tried as an adult could end up being scared straight, which will deter them from continuing to break the law. Those who commit capitol crimes, including adolescents, should be penalized according to the law. Analysis: Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults 854 Words 4 Pages Should Juveniles be tried as adults just because they commit a crime? The brothers were walking in London in November 2000 when they happened across the youngster. He should be sentenced as an adult because he is 16 years old and he knew what he was gonna do to those people and how he was gonna do it too. Proponents for trying juveniles as adults believe that a crime is a crime, even if the person who committed it was very young at the time. Barry Dale Loukaitis is one of the many kids whose crimes were so bad they were tried as adults Being one of the criminal kids whose crimes were so bad they were tried as adults is nothing new to Barry Dale Loukaitis. I find that pretty harsh because there have been some cases where the juvenile meant no harm, they were either confused or brought along by gang members and they end up being charged along with the gang members for just being with them when a crime goes down.
No One Younger Than 18 Should Be Tried as an Adult
However, we do know that he lost his right to anonymity, much like he would if he were tried as an adult. Eventually, he ended the lives of three, all of whom were under ten years old. It does not mean that because it was a child who committed the crime, the family of the victim does not continue to suffer. It may not be there fault. And they are more likely to be victimized sexually.
Why Shouldn't Juveniles Be Tried as Adults?
When teens under the age of 18 are charged with an adult crime, then one could argue that they are not having their case reviewed by people who are authentic peers. In 1899, Cook County, Illinois established the first juvenile court with the passing of the Juvenile Court Act of 1899. It creates a lifetime of effects for the child in question. When we consign our youth to the adult system, we are throwing away even that glimmer. For more than 30 years he helped prosecute juvenile cases in Orange and Osceola counties, where McKenzie was direct filed. Greg has spent 24 years in prison thinking about what he has done and there should be a decision to be made in March 2019 having to do with his case. The child sees no wrong in this until the crime is actually committed because he grew up surrounded by violence.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/list-of-persuasive-speech-topics-for-students-1857600-v5-01-5b4774d646e0fb003701911e.png)
