Why has the electoral college not been abolished. Why has the electoral college not been abolished politics essay 2022-10-22
Why has the electoral college not been abolished Rating:
The Electoral College is a system used in the United States to elect the President and Vice President. It was established by the Constitution and has been a part of the country's political system since its founding. Despite calls for its abolition over the years, the Electoral College has not been abolished. There are several reasons why this is the case.
One reason is that the Founding Fathers, who wrote the Constitution, intended for the Electoral College to serve as a compromise between having the President elected directly by the people and having Congress choose the President. They believed that the Electoral College would provide a more balanced and representative way of choosing the President, as it would give smaller states a greater say in the election.
Another reason is that the Electoral College has been an integral part of the U.S. political system for over two centuries, and any major changes to it would require a constitutional amendment. This is a difficult and time-consuming process, and there has not been enough political will to undertake it.
Additionally, the Electoral College ensures that the winner of the presidential election wins a majority of the votes, rather than a simple plurality. This helps to ensure that the President has a mandate to govern and that the outcome of the election reflects the will of the majority of the people.
Furthermore, the Electoral College helps to stabilize the political system by encouraging candidates to campaign in a broad range of states rather than just focusing on heavily populated urban areas. This helps to ensure that the President has a diverse and representative coalition of supporters.
In conclusion, the Electoral College has not been abolished because it was intended by the Founding Fathers as a compromise between direct election and Congressional selection, it has been an integral part of the U.S. political system for over two centuries, it ensures that the winner of the presidential election wins a majority of the votes, and it helps to stabilize the political system by encouraging candidates to campaign in a broad range of states.
Should We Abolish the Electoral College?
We should be talking about other things. The two parties have chosen the same year in which to nominate a person whom large numbers of Americans, probably a majority, regard as unfit though not for the same reason. A presidential candidate wins the Electoral College vote by getting at least 270 out of 538 total electoral votes. Because, according to media reports, Wyoming Representative Liz Cheney, the leading Republican on the bipartisan committee, had no interest in doing so. Presidential electors are not more qualified than other citizens to determine who should head the government. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations. Electors manage the needs of the state and community instead of following the will of the general public throughout the country.
Why We Should Never (Ever) Abolish The Electoral College
Democrats who cast ballots in South Carolina and Texas have no meaningful impact on the presidential election because their votes are drowned out by the majority of voters in the state. With popular vote Presidential Candidates would focus on large population areas, or cities known for high voter statistics. Are you sure that you want to do that? This action would allow the popular vote winner to take the White House. The state however could not vote later because they would then know the results of the other states. The Nation: The January 6 committee dropped the ball by not calling for the Electoral College to be abolished There are currently 538 electors up for grabs in an election, which means a majority of 270 is necessary to elect the President.
With the Electoral College this is in fact true due to every state being given at least three electoral votes. But even though Biden won the electoral vote, many Democrats are still pushing to abolish the electoral college for a multitude of reasons. By doing this they would almost solely focus on the issues that would win those votes. Some of his initial appointments and failure to strongly condemn the racism of some of his followers have done nothing to quiet these fears. This would mean that rather than having diverse thoughts the Presidential candidates would cater to the population with the most popular votes rather than being forced to appeal to a diverse population. Here are the yea and the nay. There are several arguments made to say the Electoral College should be abolished.
PoliticsWhy Has The Electoral College Not Been Abolished Politics Essay
Another argument against the Electoral College is that the system is outdated, that the original purpose is not being met anymore. The Presidential Candidates know full well that at the end of the campaign the only thing that matters is the number of Electoral votes. Two weeks ago it gave us Donald Trump, although Clinton will most likely have a more than two million vote edge among those who cast ballots. Knowing this in advance gives both candidates the opportunity to campaign based on this, all the decisions they make from deciding to run, to the campaign promises, to which states they choose to most heavily campaign to are with the full knowledge of how the Electoral College works. Eventually, they will likely settle one way or the other and no longer be a swing state. It would also tie up our court system because determining the winner would take importance over all other cases brought to the court at the time.
There are three basic arguments in favor of the system the framers of the Constitution gave us, with little sense of how it would actually work. The January 6 assault on the Capitol sought to disrupt Congress at the precise point when it was charged with certifying the Electoral College results from the 2020 presidential election. Although it has been argued that the Electoral College is outdated and we should revise the system I feel it has not been abandoned for several reasons. Because the Electoral College is based on the structure of state populations and representation in the House, some people have a vote that carries more weight per delegate than others. It was replaced by party conventions, which eventually were replaced almost with strings of single or multiple state primaries and caucuses.
We have 51 separate but consecutive presidential elections Washington, D. Politicians concentrate their campaigns on the swing states because those are the ones where there is a greater chance of swinging the vote one way or another. The feds are responsible for interstate commerce, military, and outward-facing behavior…and the states were responsible for everything else. And I think this allows us to get back to what the Founding Fathers had in mind. The Electoral College is a system used in the United States to elect the President and Vice President. For example suppose that only 1 state, say Montana, had 3 electoral votes and every other state had a number of electoral votes divisible by 5. Having an election in which victory went to a candidate carrying a single national constituency might not wholly cure this problem, but it might well work to mitigate it.
Two cheers for the Electoral College: Reasons not to abolish it
There have been three: John Quincy Adams, Benjamin Harrison and George W. But the real interests of small-state voters are never determined by the relative size of the population of their states. A few swing states take on oversized importance, leading the candidates to focus their attention, money, and promises on a small slice of the electorate. Imagine the problems that would arise, tensions that would exist, and the claims of illegitimacy likely to follow if the entire nation had to be counted, and then recounted to ascertain the results of the election. They simply happen to be states that become competitive because of their demography, and which are readily identifiable as such because of the increasing sophistication of political polling. But its logic, its distortion of the democratic process and its underlying flaws will still strongly influence the conduct of the election.
14 Pros and Cons of Abolishing the Electoral College
The state however could not vote later because they would then know the results of the other states. Moreover, the electoral college method preserved the two compromises over representation—the three-fifths clause and the big state-small state compromise—and guarded against a fracturing of votes for many candidates, which they thought might occur once George Washington was no longer available as a nationally respected consensus candidate. In conclusion, the Electoral College should not be abolished. The Electoral College does have some weak points, however that does not mean it should not be dismissed entirely. It is impossible for a politician to gain the 270 votes needed to win the election by just concentrating on the states with the largest population or just one region.
🐈 Why the electoral college should not be abolished. 14 Pros and Cons of Abolishing the Electoral College. 2022
Thanks to the Internet, telephones, email, social media, and every other form of communication that we have today, people can choose for themselves whether a new story has an underlying sinister bias. To that end, there were 2 separations of powers: The major separation of power was Fed vs. You aren't allowed to use any part of this example without properly citing it first. When the Constitution was signed, America consisted of the original 13 Colonies, nothing more. With popular vote Presidential Candidates would focus on large population areas, or cities known for high voter statistics.