Negative effects of lowering the drinking age. Lowering the Drinking Age Has Serious Consequences 2022-10-22
Negative effects of lowering the drinking age Rating:
6,9/10
1322
reviews
There has been much debate over the years about the appropriate legal drinking age, with some arguing that it should be lowered from 21 to 18. While it is true that young adults at the age of 18 are considered adults in many other aspects of the law and are allowed to vote, join the military, and even be tried as adults in the criminal justice system, there are several compelling reasons why the drinking age should remain at 21.
One major concern about lowering the drinking age is the impact it would have on public health and safety. Studies have shown that young people under the age of 21 are more vulnerable to the negative effects of alcohol, both physically and mentally. They are more likely to engage in risky behavior while under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking and driving, which can lead to serious accidents and fatalities. In addition, alcohol use can disrupt the development of the brain in young people, leading to long-term cognitive and behavioral problems.
Another issue with lowering the drinking age is the potential for an increase in binge drinking and alcohol abuse among young people. Research has shown that young people who begin drinking at an early age are more likely to develop alcohol dependency later in life. This can lead to a host of other problems, including health issues, relationship problems, and financial problems.
Furthermore, lowering the drinking age could have negative effects on academic performance. Studies have shown that heavy alcohol use is linked to lower grades and a higher likelihood of dropping out of school. This can have long-term consequences on a young person's future career prospects and overall quality of life.
In conclusion, while there may be some arguments in favor of lowering the drinking age, the negative effects on public health, safety, and the well-being of young people make it clear that the drinking age should remain at 21. It is important to protect young people from the potentially harmful consequences of alcohol use and to give them the time and support they need to mature and make responsible decisions about alcohol.
Pros And Cons Of Lowering The Drinking Age To 18
Posted on February 24, 2016 For decades, ever since the days of Prohibition, in fact, many politicians, academics, and parents alike have engaged in the drinking age debate — the question being whether or not the legal drinking age of 21 should be lowered to 18? In some states like Virginia, South Carolina, and South Dakota, the legal drinking age for beer and wine is eighteen, but liquor can not be consumed by a person until they are twenty-one. It is the reason we have agriculture and, thus, the reason we have civilization at all. In 1981, it was Texas, Virginia and Rhode Island again. This activity is actually one of the most common social activities in America. Lowering the legal drinking age to eighteen would have positive and negative influences on society.
As a team led by Dr. There are fewer drunk driving accidents in countries with lower drinking ages. It could reduce or even eliminate unsafe drinking activities. Through proper research it is evident that, coupled with higher parental involvement, the benefits of lowering the drinking age trumps the potential costs. One reason is that the brain can be severely damaged by alcohol, especially if they are not fully developed. While most high school and college age students would be for lowering the drinking age, do they realize how much of a challenge that responsibility really is? It makes plenty of logical sense. If you start to drink at a young age there is a higher chance of you having a stroke.
Lowering the drinking age will have some bad effects. We should do it anyway.
Smoking is especially dangerous to women during pregnancy. More deaths would likely happen on the roads due to more people driving while under the influence of alcohol Daniloff. Where Do You Stand on Lowering the Drinking Age? In 1979, it was Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire and Tennessee. Many parents, guardians, and psychologists believe that college students binge drink because they think drinking is an integral part of their higher education. Youngsters might tend to hang out with friend indulging in the alcohol in places that are not safe such as bars or nightclubs, and they would drive to their place. Many drivers wreck at the age of sixteen to twenty is caused by alcohol intake. Keeping the age at 21 has actually been not only defective for children, but for their parents and the relationships …show more content… 3.
Negative Effects of Lowering the Minimum Legal Drinking...
Although understandable, this argument appears invalid because of reasons previously mentioned. This is where the psychology behind drinking come in. With the arguments growing over whether to lower the drinking age, Americans fear the trickling effects this would have on fam. Would the absence of alcohol have prevented the events of that night from occurring? Others believe it will harm the youth even more like it did before the 1980s when the drinking age was set at 18. The drinking age should be lowered to eighteen because at that age those who are once thought of as children are now legally considered to be adults, teenagers will drink regardless of the age requirement, and if lowered teens will be able to drink in restricted areas rather than sneaking out and increasing their chances of getting into danger.
They could also get painful diseases such as inflammation of the middle ear and asthmatic bronchitis more frequently in early childhood. Alcoholism in the youth can also be influenced by genetics. Many people in the college community are calling for the drinking age to be lowered to 18 years old. Allowing them this privilege would lower drinking in house parties as well as help stop the influence of binge drinking on these students. At the repeal of Prohibition, the legal drinking age was accepted nationwide as 21, but when the voting age dropped from 21 to 18 in the early 1970s, many states followed suit by lowering the drinking age as well. Youth drinkers are twice as likely as non-drinkers to have had unwanted sex. Jones reveals that thirty years ago, when twenty-one was selected as the minimum drinking age, Americans disapproved to lowering the drinking age to eighteen Jones n.
Lowering the Drinking Age Has Serious Consequences
But success will not come without a forthright and realistic assessment of the likely consequences of lowering the drinking age. Should Drinking Age Be 18 Essay 501 Words 3 Pages Letting younger people drink is giving immature citizens more of the ability to make bad decisions that not only affect themselves but can also be very harmful to others. Underage drinking has been a major controversial issue for years, yet why is it not under control? Viewpoint: Why America should lower the legal drinking age. . The potential for addiction to alcohol is more likely, causes the drinker to take more risks, reduces decision making ability, and the potential to develop depression and commit suicide is greater.
So, how do we decide what is best for this day and time? By the time it peaked in 1982, 61 percent of 16- to 20-year-old drivers killed in car crashes had illegal blood alcohol levels. Colleges do not have a full police force around campus, and the college campus police are there as safety measures rather than law-enforcers. Lowering the minimum drinking age in the United States would mean that a very …show more content… Mixing alcohol with immaturity or responsibility will never result in good outcomes. Finally, we should do it because public policy cannot properly be guided only by an accounting of costs. Teens who drink underage are putting themselves at risk of going to jail.
The Drinking Age Debate: Pros and Cons of Lowering the Legal Drinking Age
No market could be so large without producing enormous consumer surplus, and no policy analysis is complete that fails to account for that surplus. Research indicates that the brain continues to develop until age 21, and young brains can be damaged by alcohol irreversibly. Even though some people think if the drinking age were to be lowered sounds like a good idea. We could keep it as is or we could try other things such as, teaching kids how to drink in the correct manor. We could raise the drinking age for everyday people and lower it for soldiers. Obviously alcohol is never a healthy thing and many health issues will come out of it if it is abused, but maybe lowering the legal drinking age will help with that too! States where it remained 21 to buy hard liquor covered 47 percent of the population. And it is notable, of course, that an 18-year-old is considered an adult in almost every context -- including in the voting booth -- except when ordering a beer.
Essay On The Consequences Of Lowering The Drinking Age
Alcohol is responsible for many deaths in the United States so it makes no sense to allow people to begin engaging in this dangerous act at a younger age. Whether it be through poor choices such as driving; or making idiotic decisions that could cost jail time, perhaps even the life of an individual. Lowering the national drinking age back to its pre-1984 levels will have some bad effects. America is one of the few countries that makes adults wait until they are 21 to legally be able to purchase and consume alcohol. According to the Administrative Office of the Courts, alcohol causes some effects that are positive for anxiety in dosage. The PowerPoint is a visual of how dangerous drinking can be to children, teens, and adults. Lowering the drinking age would eliminate thrill drinking.