Is terrorism justified essay. Is Terrorism Ever Justified? 2022-10-21
Is terrorism justified essay Rating:
Terrorism is the use of violence and intimidation in pursuit of political or ideological goals. It is a tactic that has been used by various groups and individuals throughout history, and it continues to be a significant global problem today. While some may argue that terrorism is justified in certain circumstances, it is ultimately a harmful and unacceptable means of achieving change.
One argument that is often made in favor of terrorism is that it is a way for marginalized or oppressed groups to resist against their oppressors. Some proponents of this view argue that terrorism is the only option available to these groups, as they lack the power and resources to achieve their goals through more peaceful means. However, this argument fails to consider the harm and suffering that terrorism causes to innocent civilians. Terrorism is often indiscriminate, meaning that it targets anyone who happens to be in the vicinity, regardless of their involvement in the conflict or their political views. This means that innocent people, including women, children, and the elderly, are often caught up in terrorist attacks and suffer serious injury or death.
Another argument that is sometimes made in favor of terrorism is that it is a way to draw attention to a cause or issue that would otherwise be ignored. Some proponents of this view argue that terrorism can be a way to force governments and other powerful actors to take notice and address the concerns of the terrorists. However, this argument ignores the fact that terrorism is a highly counterproductive tactic. Terrorism typically generates widespread fear and outrage, and it often leads to a hardening of attitudes and a greater willingness to use force in response. This can make it more difficult, not easier, for marginalized or oppressed groups to achieve their goals.
In addition to the harm and suffering that terrorism causes to innocent civilians, it is also important to consider the long-term consequences of this tactic. Terrorism often leads to a cycle of violence and retaliation, which can escalate into a full-blown conflict or even a war. This can have far-reaching and devastating consequences, including the displacement of entire communities, the destruction of infrastructure and economies, and the loss of countless lives.
Ultimately, terrorism is not a justified means of achieving political or ideological goals. While it may be tempting to resort to this tactic in situations where peaceful means of resistance seem unlikely to succeed, it is important to remember the harm and suffering that it causes to innocent people, as well as the long-term consequences that it can have. Instead of resorting to terrorism, marginalized or oppressed groups should seek to find peaceful and nonviolent ways to address their concerns and achieve their goals.
Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified?
However these civilians are not guilty they pay taxes because its compulsory not because they want planes to bomb Afghanistan, they do not give the orders which kill their people, they have no real voice in the matter. How have terrorists in the past justified their actions?. The terrorist even holds the innocents punishable for their crime of ignoring him and his causes. He made an addition: causing great fear has no reasoning, nofield of interest what trick reasons given one causing great fearmay use for their land ownership statements. The terrorist however unlike the guerrilla fighter does not seek to demolish political authority for the sake of creating an improved authority in its place; his activities are not outcome-oriented.
Terrorism's Serious Problems: Can It Be Justified?
. In this paper, I will employ the ethical frameworks of virtue, rights, and fairness to argue against torture when viewed from the perspective of the victim, the torturer, and any outside source. As Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon declared at a NATO meeting, "Nothing can justify terrorism - ever" Terrorism on American Soil ends with our "War on Terror which only leads to more violence, it's like a dominoes chain, once violence starts, it doesn't stop. Violence cannot be condemned outright even if it is a type of force. .
. Terrorism today is the use of violence usually against other countries aimed towards politics. Terrorism cannot be an entirely biased term derived by the governments in power as a way of delegitimizing those with less power. Ostensibly, some of those involved in terrorism are people with good education and strong moral convictions. Terrorists are usually considered bad not because of the objectives they are attempting to accomplish, but rather because of the method they go about attaining these and the fact that their actions are not state sponsored and that they do not have an official national movement status, such as a war, declaration of war would. Recently, the terrorist organisation Al-Shabaab attacked a shopping mall and a college in Kenya causing destruction of life and materials.
Once we denounce the kind of violence adopted by the terrorist there is not much of case for defending his acts on grounds of morality. . The terrorists claim to be content that their activity is expressive in nature. People go around the world killing others for no reason. The debate about the morality of terrorism has become a hot topic today, and a common question is caused whether terrorism is justified or whether it is always wrong.
Terrorism is a multifaceted, complicated concept with deep roots, which is what makes it so difficult to define. Without torture there would still be a terrorist running free on the streets of Boston. All in all, terrorism is a term which is broadly used to describe the use of violence or force in order to achieve certain social and political goals Dingley, 2010. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. He may also find in his violence an adequate means to express his private anger.
Political, economic and social causes can be identified for the mushrooming of terrorist groups. After World War II, the victorious allied powers felt it necessary to give the Jewish people a homeland, perhaps as a token of Western guilt in allowing the Holocaust to occur. The taking of guiltless life for one's own progression of a cause cannot be allowed to go as justifiable. Rather than seeing them as criminals in the society, supporters of terrorism look upon terrorists as heroes pursuing a justified cause. Some may argue that a terrorist act is a terrorist act and should all be dealt the same way.
A lot of people go around wondering who or what caused the terrorists to attack. Yet when Palestinians respond with rocket attacks and suicide bombings, we call them terrorists. Justifying innocent slaughter suggests that terrorists believe that political or religious conflicts are more prominent than a segment of typically uninvolved humans. Terrorism as an act of the same nation or against another nation by a political minority can be regarded as an act of Total conflict which by definitions includes the whole populace of both of the opposing armed forces as participants in the war. This paper talks about the different aspects of terrorism throughout the world. For example, during World War II, all countries involved were deploying their civilian…. The media has made it easier to attack and get the fame that terrorist want Simonsen and Spindlove Pg.
It is however difficult to establish and define the motivations of terrorists. Justifying innocent slaughter suggests that terrorists believe that political or religious conflicts are more prominent than a segment of typically uninvolved humans. Smilansky 2004 highlights various issues that make terrorist activities illegal. According to the utilitarian ethics, an action should be judged according to its utility or usefulness. It is complex because it combines so many varied aspects of human experience, including arenas such as politics, social discourse, psychology, philosophy, military strategy, and history, to name a few.
The moral justification of terrorism is not possible under any circumstances. The terrorist could have chosen to blow up the arms reserve or attack the base directly to render it unable to attack. If everyone around the world except the terrorists themselves dislikes the terrorists, then who is providing them money to get all their resources? There are rare instances when terrorism can be condoned and hence justified. Rajiv Gandhi, was ruthlessly blown o pieces by a terrorist. In several studies, suggestions about justifying certain cases of terrorism in the sense of political violence against civilians have strongly been opposed Smilansky, 2004.