Every country should have nuclear weapons. Why should any country have nuclear bomb? 2022-11-12

Every country should have nuclear weapons Rating: 7,9/10 1647 reviews

It is a highly controversial and complex issue whether every country should have nuclear weapons. While some argue that having nuclear weapons can serve as a deterrent and provide security, others believe that the proliferation of nuclear weapons can lead to serious consequences and increase the risk of global conflict.

One argument in favor of every country having nuclear weapons is that it can serve as a deterrent against aggression. The theory of mutually assured destruction (MAD) suggests that the possession of nuclear weapons by multiple countries can prevent major wars because the consequences of a nuclear conflict would be catastrophic for all sides. In this view, having nuclear weapons can deter potential adversaries from attacking or invading a country because they know that the country has the means to defend itself with nuclear weapons.

However, there are also several drawbacks to this argument. First, the proliferation of nuclear weapons can increase the risk of accidental or unintended use. If more countries have nuclear weapons, there is a greater chance that one of these weapons could be used by mistake or through miscommunication. This could lead to catastrophic consequences, as a nuclear conflict would not only affect the countries directly involved, but could also have devastating impacts on the rest of the world.

Another argument against every country having nuclear weapons is that it can lead to an arms race, as countries may feel the need to constantly increase the size and capabilities of their nuclear arsenals in order to maintain a balance of power. This arms race can be costly and divert resources away from other important domestic needs. It can also lead to an increase in tensions between countries, as they may perceive each other as threats and become more aggressive in their foreign policies.

In addition, the proliferation of nuclear weapons can contribute to the destabilization of international relations. If more countries have nuclear weapons, it may be more difficult to resolve conflicts peacefully, as the threat of nuclear escalation could be used to intimidate other countries. This can lead to an increased risk of global conflict and make it harder to achieve international cooperation on important issues such as climate change, global health crises, and economic instability.

Overall, while the possession of nuclear weapons may provide some sense of security and deterrence, the potential risks and drawbacks of every country having nuclear weapons are significant. The international community must carefully consider the consequences of proliferation and work towards disarmament and non-proliferation efforts in order to promote global peace and stability.

Every country should have nuclear weapons : China

every country should have nuclear weapons

If a powerful country like America started to reduce its arsenal, then a lot of countries would follow suit and condemn those who don't. Should any country be allowed to have nuclear weapons? The United Nations proposed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. The underlying logic of his seemingly counterintuitive theory is simple: countries may not even begin conventional conflicts if they think their adversaries might go all the way up the escalation chain. Candidate Trump, in March 2016, famously suggested South Korea and Japan nuke up and defend themselves. PDF from the original on 19 October 2008. However, the peace was maintained because of the balance of power. They hide behind their nukes to perform terrorist activity against India because they know India won't retaliate because they have nukes.

Next

Every country should have nuclear weapons : unpopularopinion

every country should have nuclear weapons

. Neither debater did a good job of directly addressing the other's arguments or developing the points they made themselves. PDF from the original on 11 September 2013. Posts about bans or removals on other subreddits are not allowed. The Bomb — South Africa's Nuclear Weapons Programme. Also, he kind of shoots himself in the foot by also bringing up the passage of safety policies meant to prevent future accidental detonations. It is entirely plausible to give merely the concentrated trusted world powers a handful as merely two were enough to stop a world war and trust them to act in accordance.

Next

A look at how countries go nuclear — and why some do not

every country should have nuclear weapons

Also given that Pakistan uses state sponsored terrorism as official foreign policy against countries they don't like India, Afg etc. While experts generally agree that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, no such current open source consensus exists on the status of Israel's offensive chemical or biological weapons programs. Now there are only about 14,000 weapons, a lower amount but still enough to end life as we know it. Arguments: Deterrence Con says that nuclear deterrence doesn't solve the problem of mistrust and fear. On that day, the country of The United States of America, dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima in Japan. . Unfortunately, this is the reality of the world; the countries that do not yet acquire nuclear weapons will inevitably develop some in the future.

Next

Should every country have the right to develop nuclear weapons?

every country should have nuclear weapons

At the time, the U. One could say all Americans have a right to guns, but what's meant by that is Americans who aren't mentally crazed, Americans who don't have a criminals past banning them from guns. Submarines and naval craft can be outfitted with nuclear weapons so that they can be fired from any ocean-based location on the planet. It takes little for their government to go kaput and harm all of South Asia. Memes, images, videos, gifs, and other types of media are allowed but are strictly moderated. Retrieved 16 September 2015.

Next

16 Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons

every country should have nuclear weapons

The logic remains questionable, though. Retrieved 5 August 2020. China and Russian would have an opportunity and take control. The worst scenario is many innocwnt people would die if any nuclear war would happen. Retrieved 29 April 2010. However, the United Nations is gradually increasing in power and the five people generally trust each other relatively well, even with the cold war separating US and Russia' relations. Two of the most well-known bombs are the atomic Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs.

Next

Resolved: All nations should have a right to nuclear weapons

every country should have nuclear weapons

. Retrieved 6 August 2014. User Flair: You can select flair to indicate your nationality by clicking edit above. This bomb however, used plutonium 239, in its construction. If Washington cannot stop the North Koreas and Irans of the world, truly peaceful societies will need—and they will insist on having—the means to defend themselves from the worst elements in the international system. Recently India did test of Agni-5 intercontinental ballistic missile and it hardly received any criticism because of its proximity towards west.

Next

Nuclear weapon

every country should have nuclear weapons

Retrieved 23 June 2009. The heatwave was felt over 50 km away. In the past, city-states would build walls to protect the population. Pro dropped Con's destructive argument and responded with a nihilistic viewpoint Wars will happen with or without. Nevertheless, there were a lot of local conflicts during the Cold War and there are still many conflicts now in the twenty first century. Even if military complexes are struck with a nuclear weapon, there will be civilian casualties.


Next

Countries with Nuclear Weapons 2022

every country should have nuclear weapons

Here are the essential pros and cons of nuclear weapons to consider. Retrieved 23 July 2019. The Soviet Union had the most nuclear weapons during the Cold War. And many wealthy countries, including Australia, Brazil, Germany, Japan, and South Korea, have chosen not to pursue weapons programs. It is a deterrent for starting a major conflict. This happens because there is no balance of power between a nuclear country and a non-nuclear one. Other countries have gone nuclear in other ways.

Next

Should More Nations Have Nukes?

every country should have nuclear weapons

Nuclear Weapons Since 1940 Washington, D. . I am not saying that full abolition of nuclear weapons is possible in this lifetime, but we should take the steps towards that beneficial goal. Every detonation creates radiation that, if someone were exposed to it, could create grave consequences. The energy emitted from the explosion equaled about 15,000 tons of TNT.

Next

Every country in the world should have nuclear weapons : unpopularopinion

every country should have nuclear weapons

He only uses them in R1. It changes the power and status of a nation. The boys in Tehran know Israel has 200, all targeted on Tehran, and we have thousands. Among other questions that continue to rise up 70 years later is whether an administration presided over by Franklin Roosevelt would have gone as far as the one led by Harry Truman, who was barely aware of his nation's atomic capability when he was propelled into power less than four months before he decided to use it. Retrieved 24 January 2018. If that is the case, then their program.

Next