Doctrine of ministerial responsibility. ministerial responsibility 2022-10-24
Doctrine of ministerial responsibility Rating:
9,5/10
1915
reviews
Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street is a book written by Karen Ho, a sociologist who spent several years studying the culture and practices of investment banks on Wall Street. The book provides a detailed and nuanced look at the world of finance and the people who work within it, offering insights into the ways in which these institutions operate and the motivations and behaviors of their employees.
One of the key themes of the book is the role of culture in shaping the financial industry. Ho argues that the culture of Wall Street is one that is highly individualistic, competitive, and risk-taking, with a strong emphasis on performance and success. This culture is reflected in the way that employees are expected to work, with long hours and a high level of dedication being the norm. It is also reflected in the way that employees are compensated, with large bonuses being awarded to those who excel and those who fail being quickly eliminated.
Another theme of the book is the way in which Wall Street firms seek to maintain their competitive advantage. Ho shows how these firms use a variety of strategies to stay ahead of the competition, including recruiting top talent, developing cutting-edge technology, and aggressively pursuing new business opportunities. However, she also points out that this focus on competition can lead to a lack of collaboration and a failure to consider the broader social and ethical implications of financial decisions.
Overall, Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street is a fascinating and thought-provoking book that offers valuable insights into the inner workings of the financial industry. It is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the culture and practices of Wall Street and the broader world of finance.
Ministerial Responsibility
Nevertheless, the rule is justified on the basis that an outgoing government might be tempted to remove politically sensitive documentation if it feared that a new government would make political capital out of it. Individual ministerial responsibility is not the same as cabinet collective responsibility, which states members of the cabinet must approve publicly of its collective decisions or resign. On the other hand, for a principle to be called a convention, it does not have to come into operation through judicial processes. Cabinet Papers have also had the cloak of confidentiality as cabinet discussion is protected by the prohibition against disclosure by members of the government. Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp The foundation of the Australian Government reflects the values of religious tolerance, freedom of speech and association, and the rule of law.
A minister cannot push the blame to his cabinet colleagues or anyone under the concept of collective cabinet responsibility. Function of Individual Ministerial ResponsibilityTo enable ministers to take responsible for their own conduct and that of their departments' actions. Furthermore, Ministerial responsibility is a innovation of the England Bill of Rights of 1688 and it was until 1832 when this doctrine got its true profile and the force of law. Article 57 2 c of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania impliedly provides that a minister is individually responsible to the President. So the government is held responsible or accountable for its actions by the National Assembly. In the Westminster system, powers may be distributed on a unitary or federal basis, but their exercise is governed by the common principle of responsible government. In 1931-32, the National coalition government contained bitterly opposing views over economic policy; in particular, over the levy of tariff duties.
Senior ministers are titled as Ministers, whereas junior ministers are titled as Secretaries of State. Collective Responsibility Collective ministerial responsibility entails all ministers presenting a united front in the interest of government unity. Those are the judgements they are there to make. This in turn requires that the privacy of opinions expressed in Cabinet and Ministerial Committees should be maintained. Furthermore, the papers of the previous government may not be disclosed to a government of a different political persuasion. They allegedly give the constitutional flexibility. Nor do I find the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice exhibited by the framers particularly profound.
A responsible government is the one which is accountable to the people who put that government into power article 8. Thus Collective Responsibility applies even where a Minister had no part in the discussion of a full cabinet. Neither of the Permanent Secretaries who presided over the west coast mainline franchising There is only one notable case of a civil servant resigning over an administrative failure — when … but it is often hard to work out who has failed The old version of ministerial responsibility assumed that any failure should be laid at the door of the minister. A prime minister is the head of a cabinet and the leader of the ministers in the executive branch of government, often in a parliamentary or semi-presidential system. Testimony needs to be accurate and truthful in accordance with statutes including Freedom of Information Act 2000. This is how it was originally intended and these rules will help further this intention.
The Cabinet, the Outer Ministry, and the Assistant Ministers collectively form the full Commonwealth Ministry of the government of the day. Disadvantages The Doctrine prevents minority party ministers from expressing dissenting opinions in public. Where there is ministerial responsibility, the accountable minister is expected to take the blame and ultimately resign, but the majority or coalition within parliament of which the minister is part, is not held to be answerable for that minister's failure. Ministers are appointed by the Governor-General, on the advice of the Prime Minister, who serve at the former's pleasure. The rationale for the convention lies in the need for government to present united front to parliament and the public in order to maintain confidence. Sanctions include censure and dismissal.
Minister as the representative of the public face of their department and who speaks for the department in Parliament. The final restriction relates to opinions or attitudes of Cabinet colleagues, advice given to him by colleagues and criticism of those working for him in office. These initial definitions of constitutional conventions also imply that the doctrine of ministerial responsibility, too, is flexible in nature and does not have strict legal implications. The classic doctrine of this limb of ministerial responsibility states that a minister is responsible for every action of his department. In addition, the rules regarding the confidentiality of Cabinet papers include the rule that the government of the day may not release papers of a previous government without the consent of the former Prime Minister. There can be failure due to the actions of a single civil servant makes a mistake in executing their duties or it can also be due to a foolish policy decision, or a failure to act of the individual minister.
Ministerial Responsibility: [Essay Example], 1312 words GradesFixer
Another factor that grants the responsible government power is winning majority seats in the House of Commons. The knowledge that Cabinet records are protected by confidentiality enhances the opportunity for members of Cabinet to discuss matters freely, secure in the knowledge that their personal point of view, whatever the decision, will be protected from the public gaze. Legislative power is vested in the Parliament of Finland, and the Government has limited rights to amend or extend legislation. The minister must resign if a vote of censure is possed against him. Lord Morrison viewed the doctrine equally strictly…a minister is accountable to Parliament for anything he or his department does or for anything he has powers to do whether he does it or not.
A complaint concerning the unlawfulness of an official act of a member of the Council of State or the Chancellor of Justice may also be filed in Parliament. This is to protect the civil servants' identity. Executors of the estate of Mr Cape sought to publish his diaries while the government sought an injunction and although the convention was recognized, the injunction was rejected due to the lapse of time. Locke Vs Tocqueville Analysis 1084 Words 5 Pages Introduction: While freedom as a concept feels fairly intuitive, nuances in interpretation can change the basis of an argument. For example, In England, the concept of Ministerial responsibility has evolved with the Westminster system of government. However on the other hand, while responsible government can be understandably be seen to have errors and hence be in need of improvement, it is definitely still operating in the way in which was originally intended.
