Democracy vs dictatorship in pakistan. Democracy vs dictatorship 2022-10-23
Democracy vs dictatorship in pakistan
Pakistan is a country located in South Asia and has a rich history of political instability and military rule. Since its independence in 1947, Pakistan has alternated between periods of democracy and dictatorship.
Democracy in Pakistan is characterized by regular elections, the rule of law, and the protection of civil liberties. In a democracy, the government is elected by the people and is accountable to them. Political parties compete for power through the electoral process, and the will of the people is reflected in the decisions of the government.
Despite the ideals of democracy, Pakistan has often struggled to maintain a stable and effective democratic system. The country has experienced several military coups and periods of military rule, during which the military has seized control of the government and imposed its own rules and policies. Military dictators have often suspended the constitution and suppressed political opposition, leading to widespread human rights abuses and a lack of accountability.
One of the most significant periods of military rule in Pakistan was under the leadership of General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, who ruled from 1977 to 1988. During his tenure, Zia implemented a number of authoritarian policies, including the introduction of harsh Islamic laws and the suppression of political opposition. His rule was marked by widespread human rights abuses and a lack of accountability, as well as economic stagnation and widespread corruption.
In contrast to dictatorship, democracy offers a more stable and accountable form of government. It allows for the peaceful transfer of power and ensures that the government is accountable to the people. In a democracy, citizens have the right to participate in the political process and to hold their government accountable for its actions.
Despite its challenges, democracy has the potential to bring about positive change in Pakistan. By allowing for the free and fair expression of the will of the people, democracy can help to promote economic development, social justice, and respect for human rights.
Overall, the choice between democracy and dictatorship in Pakistan is a complex one. While dictatorship has often brought stability in the short term, it has also led to widespread human rights abuses and a lack of accountability. In contrast, democracy offers the potential for long-term stability and the promotion of the common good, but it requires a strong commitment to the rule of law and the protection of civil liberties. Ultimately, the success of democracy in Pakistan will depend on the willingness of its citizens and leaders to uphold its principles and values.
Dictatorship vs. Democracy
All four served president of Pakistan for many years. However, many journalists and political analysts still termed this democratic government as a controlled democracy. Are we expected to be numb to this? Our politicians have no faith in our institutions. But this operation has resulted in displacement of nearly three million people from this region. To remain in power for a long period, like a king, is very difficult in democratic society. Al Ghazzali, a prominent Islamic theologian of the 12th century, often stated the need to avoid fitna strife and anarchy. Then on 26 th March General Yahya appeared on national television announced to enforce martial law.
Democracy Vs Dictatorship In Pakistan [1d47rd0yoml2]
The accident proved to be very costly for the country as almost the entire military elite of Pakistan was onboard. Democracy is the government of people in which the supreme power is vested in people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system. You yourself say that the 'the only thing government did wrong was shooting on the protectors'. These were the years when Pakistan was getting the record development as the nation as well as dealing with other national and international crisis. They inherited the British military traditions and their officer corps was trained in British military institutions or the institutions established by the colonial rulers in India.
What is the difference between dictatorship and democracy in Pakistan?
Which System is better for Pakistan? We have seen Dyer in the form of military dictators who played havoc with the civilians. Opposition should not blame ruling party for ragging. They should give the time for democracy to flourish. Pakistan is facing intense external and internal problems. Pakistan has witnessed a more controlled democracy than the actual democracy.
Pakistan: Democracy vs Dictatorship
His failure to maintain a balance between the diverse political, economic, social and regional forces indulged the country into one of the most unfortunate civil wars of he 20th Century. With a sharp mind like that, I wonder why you're saying this on an online messaging board and not a government-funded think tank. We have to prove ourselves as a nation, we have to fight this war, we have to save Pakistan, we have to once again sew the seed of peace, love, cooperation, respect, equality and above all seek help from Allah Almighty. But then again our nation does have an incredibly short memory. The various internal challenges facing Pakistan today are a blowback of this basic challenge of identity. There is American pressure and now the war against terror has become our own war and our politicians have to accept this. In 1969, the nationwide mass agitation paralyzed the Ayub regime.
Democracy vs dictatorship
Zia-ul-Haq became president in 1978. During Nawaz Rule Pakistan two floods and a wind storm and approximately 20 million people were affected. The inflation in musharaf rule was very well controlled except for 2008 when the rate of inflation was increased to 20% while the average inflation rate per year during his rule was 7%. The government is aiming to fill this gap partly with help Democracy or Dictatorship 8 of Friends of Pakistan and partly from internal resources. This encouraged them to play a direct political role and assume power. Opponents should be tolerated and not eliminated. Political system in Pakistan has seen in upheavals since its creation in 1947.
Democracy Versus Dictatorship In Pakistan;Students Debate Corner
The nature of the military. As a result of their aggressive politics, religious-oriented parties are successfully mobilizing the people, and forcing the secular and enlightened elements to recede from main political activities. Pakistani politics is full of hatred. If a little freedom is given to them then look at today's Pakistan. Rather people are shifting their assets to foreign countries due to uncertainty instability in the country. We have seen him in the politicised bureaucrats who dance at the unlawful orders of their godfathers.
Democracy VS Dictatorship
Let us now compare these five years from the government of Mr. But one wonders if there is any difference between the dictatorial regimes and the so-called champions of democracy. General Zia ul Haq 1977-88 sought legitimacy in religion, for him Pakistan had been created in the name of Islam and the reason for the 1971 break up as well as any problems to date had been because his predecessors had moved away from Islam. The repeated military interventions in politics since 1958 and especially the military rules of Zia and Musharaf, has altered the traditional pattern of civil-military relations. But unfortunately in history of Pakistani politics we not see such a good and healthy activity. The second coup took place in 1969 General Yahya Khan and the third coup in 1977 General Zia-ul-Haque and the fourth General Pervez Musharaf from 1999 to 2008. In North Korea, there is no concept of information and broadcasting agency.
Democracies And Dictatorships In Pakistan History Essay
In this type of government or social situation, the individual who possesses absolute power makes all the rules and decisions without input from anyone else and no one can oppose that. After all, eleven is not a huge death toll in a country like Pakistan. The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune. The unemployment rate also decreased by 27% in the ten year of Zia-Ul-Haq. Unemployment is the fifth economic factor which we have used to evaluate governments in the past thirty years and this also shows that the unemployment was least during the rule of Zia-Ul-Haq while Musharaf had the highest unemployment rates. This is the biggest displacement of mass of people after independence. Under the dictatorship of Yahya Khan, East Pakistan — Now Bangladesh — secedes in 1971.
Dictatorship Vs. Democracy in Pakistan
Then there is problem of rehabilitation of these displaced people. And we have also seen him in the common man who kills in the name of religion. During his rule there were two major natural disasters and in those natural disasters approx 4 million people were affected. General Muhammad Ayub Khan, the then Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, became the Chief Martial Law Administrator. That the same conditions prevailed in India did not seem like an anachronism to the general. So what should we do for a healthy political system.
Their principal ally is the civil bureaucracy who shares several organizational attributes and perspectives with them. In a feudal culture, either there is intense friendship or intense enmity, but no middle course of toleration. Here, we have to understand the role and relation of military with politics. Prashant 8 years ago Reply Just look at the history and you would know that democracy does not work in Muslim countries even with Shariyat and a state religion. Criticism is regarded as personal insult and defeat as humiliation.